Mixed reactions trail JAMB’s cut-off marks to institutions; https-jamb-gov-ng

The decision by the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) to peg the minimum cut-off mark for admission into the country’s universities at 140 for the 2022/2023 academic session is currently generating ripples.

You May also like

The examination body put that of Polytechnics at 120 and Colleges of Education at 100.

While some described the development as a setback for the nation’s education, others said that lowering the cut-off marks was good news for admission seekers.

A Professor of Botany at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), Prof Joseph Edwards, said lowering UTME cut-off marks would jeopardise the nation’s education standard.

He argued that a student, who cannot score 200 out of 400 marks in UTME, may find it difficult to excel when admitted.

According to him, 140 out of 400 is 35 per cent at ‘O’ level result, which is F9 and any student who scores F9 in core subjects like English Language or Mathematics cannot gain admission to the university.

Edwards noted that such students, when admitted, would not be able to cope with their mates and would end up re-sitting their papers.

He said federal universities were still finding it hard to accommodate many of the candidates, even at the cut-off marks of 200 and above, not to talk of when it was dropped to 140.

He appealed to JAMB to dialogue with universities to be advised accordingly on admission scores.

This, he said, would make the nation’s graduates able to compete with their counterparts globally.

Also, Prof. Dada Oluokun of Ekiti State University said the continuous lowering of UTME cut-off marks would definitely affect the quality of applicants being offered admission into federal universities.

“It only encourages applicants, whose parents are wealthy to patronise private universities and this may affect standardisation of admission,” Oluokun said.

But Prof. Clement Kolawole of the Department of Education, University of Ibadan, said there would be no serious implication. “It was what the agency considered to be realistic,” Kolawole said.

A retired Professor of Education Evaluation, Prof. Adams Onuka, said the decision indicates that the teaching and learning processes in schools had been ineffective.

This, Onuka said, could be due to some intervening factors that were likely to be multifarious, such as family, social, school and funding factors, among others.

“The immediate implication is that our school system is not living up to expectations in the production of future leaders for the nation; as garbage in equals garbage out. It means that we are feeding the tertiary education system with ill-prepared inputs and the outputs would, therefore, be half-baked.

“It’s not the duty of the tertiary education system to prepare learners for the primary and secondary education system, which are the foundation for the tertiary education system.

“This trend, if not arrested, will likely lead to the collapse of the entire education system, leadership development process and societal development as a whole,” Onuka said.

The don said the situation could also lead to a greater exodus of youths to other climes and further depreciate the Naira, as a result of a higher rate of capital flight.

“Thus, all hands must be on the deck to address the abnormality with immediate effect. In fact, we need to declare a state of emergency in the education sector.

“We must fund it and carry out research so that innovative measures and remedies can be evolved to bring our education system back on track.

“Needs assessment of the sector, in terms of quality of teachers at the primary and secondary sub-systems, infrastructure and facilities, management and governance, as well as teaching and learning interactions and parental responsibilities, should be immediately done before any other process is carried out.

“This is to properly evolve lasting and enduring solutions to this unexpected outcome in the education system,” he said.

An educationist, Dr Tony Onuoha, expressed concern over the matter, warning that the trend would ultimately destroy the fabrics of education system in the country.

Adeleye lamented that the standard of education at the tertiary level would continue to dwindle with such a policy.

He said the such policy would also continue to encourage mediocrity, with the tertiary institutions producing half-baked graduates with serious consequences on the nation’s economy and future.

“I don’t see any sense in lowering the cut-off marks, I don’t know why the administration handling JAMB is bent on reducing the cut-off marks yearly and destroying the lives of students. Are we saying that hard work doesn’t matter these days? These days, some students cannot even express themselves or write fairly well, and one wonders how they got into tertiary institutions.

“We have destroyed values, morals and hard work and we need to go back to where we are coming from. Students, who are supposed to be in technical schools, are finding their way into universities. It is not that technical schools are not good; they have their own advantages because they help to fix students into places where they are best fitted for the purpose of further grooming,” he said.

Dr Adeola Adeniyi, an education consultant, said the trend would encourage laziness and discourage healthy competition among students.

He said students should work hard to meet up with cut-off marks of their desired course.

A public analyst, Ola Bamigboye, justified the lowering of the cut-off marks, saying the decision would create a level playing field for students seeking admission into tertiary institutions.

Bamigboye argued that the continuous lowering of UTME cut-off marks would not affect education standards.

He said: “When it comes to the standard of admission, what really matters is the result of the West Africa Examinations Council (WAEC).”

Bamigboye explained that lowering the cut-off marks was to safeguard those institutions who may want to fix their cut-off marks below the 140 stipulated by JAMB.

He noted that UTME result is only a prerequisite requirement for admission, adding that what qualifies a student are the five ‘O’ Level credits in relevant subjects.

According to him, some of those who scored 180 get admission to make first-class or end up being the best graduating students. “We have also seen students who scored 360 in UTME, but could not compete with those who scored 180.”

A retired school Principal and Administrator, Moses Elujoba, said the lowering of cut-off marks would create room for laziness among students. “Instead of them working and studying hard to achieve the desired excellent grade in the entrance examinations, they will only prefer to limit their scope towards their now reduced cut-off marks,” he said.

On his part, Linus Onyiogbo of Abia State University, Uturu, urged JAMB to rather increase the UTME cut-off marks to save the nation’s education from total collapse.

Onyiogbo explained that lowering of UTME cut-off mark had just shown the deliberate tendencies to bastardise the tertiary education system.

“How can JAMB give a student, who scored just 140, which is equivalent to about 35 per cent of 400, a pass mark to be admitted into a university? I want to say that any student, who cannot score at least 180, has no business in the university. I will like to appeal to the Federal Government and JAMB to reconsider their plans to lower the UTME cut-off marks and stop bastardising tertiary education in Nigeria,” he said.

Related Posts: JAMB

In the same vein, Mr Suleiman Yusuf of the Mass Communication Department, Kwara State University (KWASU), Malete, said he could not conceive the rationale behind the decision to lower the mark.

Yusuf said: “I find the rationale behind such a crucial decision inconceivable, it all points to the fact that our tertiary education system needs a very quick intervention if it must be globally competitive.

”Despite the fact that there is a clause, which empowers individual universities to fix its own cut-off marks, it still gives room for the age-long lopsidedness in the admission policies and procedures of Nigerian universities.”

But reacting, JAMB clarified that it is the responsibility of tertiary institutions to decide and determine their admission cut-off mark and not JAMB as was widely believed by candidates.

JAMB spokesman, Dr. Fabian Benjamin, said there is nothing like a uniform minimum national UTME score for tiers of tertiary institutions, neither does JAMB decide any such requirement for any institution for the purpose of admissions.